Purchasing Services Information

KU Procurement Policy

KU Policy| Procurement Policies at the University of Kansas

The University of Kansas

POLICY LIBRARY
http://www.policy.ku.edu

CATEGORY:

Financial:  Purchasing

POLICY STATUS:

Approved

 

POLICY TITLE:

Procurement Policies at the University of Kansas

POLICY ADDRESS:

https://documents.ku.edu/policies/comptroller/Comptroller-Purchasing-Procurement_Policy.htm

POLICY PURPOSE:

See Section III – Purpose

APPLIES TO:

University of Kansas departments and offices.

 

CONTENTS:

Section I – Introduction

Section II – Authority and Delegation

Section III – Purpose

Section IV – Applicability

Section V – Ethics and Conflict of Interest

Section VI – Competitive Bids

Section VII – Vendor Suspension

Section VIII – Vendor Debarment

Section IX – Dispute Resolution

Section X – Procurement Records

Appendix A – University of Kansas Procurement Code of Ethics

Appendix B – University of Kansas Conflict of Interest Policy

Appendix C – Kansas Open Records Act

 

 

 

POLICY STATEMENT:

Section I – Introduction

The 2006 Kansas legislature enacted Senate KSA 76-769. This statute authorizes the Kansas Board of Regents to select two (2) institutions for purposes of conducting a three (3) year pilot project commencing on June 1, 2007 and ending June 30, 2010. During the time period specified, the institutions selected shall be exempt from the purchasing statutes that are contained in K.S.A. 75-3737a through 75-3744 and the Kansas Correctional Industries statutes contained in K.S.A. 75-5273 through K.S.A. 75-5282.

Section II – Authority and Delegation

KSA 76-769, Sections 1 (a) (2) and (3) grant authority to the Kansas Board of Regents to approve the policies regarding the acquisition of any supplies, materials, equipment, goods, property and services required by the pilot institutions.

The Board of Regents has directed the Chancellor of the University of Kansas as the Chief Executive Officer of the state university participating in the pilot project to develop and implement the policies required to administer and operate the pilot project in accordance with all terms, conditions and requirements detailed in KSA 76-769 and Board Policies.

The Chancellor of the University of Kansas may delegate the administration of the policies and procedures developed to the appropriate staff and departments on the campus at his/her sole discretion.

Section IIa – Administration of the Delegated Authority

Upon the effective date of these Procurement Policies, the Chancellor of the University of Kansas shall delegate to the University of Kansas Director of Purchasing all purchasing authority. The KU Director of Purchasing may further delegate his/her authority to persons in university departments for the efficient operation of the university in accordance with the terms of this KU Procurement Policies document.

Consistent with the provisions of this Policy document, the KU Director of Purchasing may adopt operational procedures governing the internal purchasing functions of the university, including purchases at the department level.

Section IIb – Delegation

I hereby delegate the authority to conduct all purchasing authority to the University of Kansas Director of Purchasing

Signed: ________________________________

  Robert Hemenway, Chancellor

Date: ________________________________

Section III – Purpose

This University of Kansas Procurement Policies document is intended to establish the parameters of a purchasing program that is specifically designed to support and facilitate the instructional, research, and public service missions of the University by applying best methods and best business practices when the University is acquiring supplies, materials, equipment, goods, property and services.

Within the context of the University environment, these Policies are intended to promote the development and use of purchasing processes that promote the pursuit of excellence and the best interests of the University while maintaining the highest possible integrity, broad based competition, fair and equal treatment of the business community and increased economies and efficiencies in the purchasing process. Examples include seeking higher education pricing in lieu of governmental pricing, utilizing procurement processes and procedures that allow shorter processing times, developing specifications that are university specific, and dramatically increasing the flexibility of the purchasing process.

The results of these efforts shall be reported by comparing, at a minimum, the costs paid when utilizing university or cooperative contracts versus the prices paid when utilizing state contracts, comparing the processing times associated with competitive bid transactions processed during the term of the pilot project versus the processing times associated with competitive transactions prior to the pilot project, and measuring the number of transactional approvals required during the pilot project versus those required prior to the pilot project

The University shall communicate and collaborate with the State of Kansas Division of Purchases and other state universities to insure that all procurement opportunities where mutual benefit can be obtained are achieved. Examples include participating instate sponsored contract development meetings, utilizing state contracts when they meet the needs of the university and allowing state agencies and other state universities to access contracts and pricing agreements entered into by the university during the course of the pilot project whenever possible.

The KU Director of Purchasing and members of the KU Purchasing Services department shall work collaboratively with the University Director of Internal Audit and their staff as operating procedures and reporting mechanisms are developed and audits of individual departments are conducted to insure adherence to proper purchasing procedures.

Section IV – Applicability

A. General Applicability

These Policies apply to the acquisition of all supplies, materials, equipment, goods, property and services that are paid for with funds on deposit with the state treasury.

B. Exclusions

These Policies do not apply to the following situations:

1.       Purchases where fifty (50) percent or more of the funding for a transaction is on deposit with the University of Kansas Center for Research.

2.       Purchases made with University of Kansas Endowment Funds.

Section V – Ethics and Conflict of Interest

A. Code of Ethics

All parties involved in the negotiation, performance, or administration of the acquisition of any supplies, materials, equipment, goods, property and services required by the University are bound to act in good faith. Any person employed by the University who purchases supplies, materials, equipment, goods, property and services, or is involved in the purchasing process for the University, shall be held to the highest degree of trust and shall be bound to the University of Kansas Procurement Code of Ethics. (See Appendix A)

B. Conflict of Interest

The University of Kansas “Conflict of Interest Policy” defines the processes to be followed in articulating and resolving conflicts of interest at the University. When the KU Director of Purchasing has reason to believe that a conflict of interest may exist in the acquisition of goods and services he/she will direct the affected department to comply with the procedures described in this policy. (See Appendix B)

Section VI – Competitive Bids

A. Competitive Bid Policy

It shall be the policy of the University to purchase all required supplies, materials, equipment, goods, property and services in a manner that affords vendors a fair and equal opportunity to compete.

B. Competitive Bid Thresholds

1.       Up to $5,000 – The KU Director of Purchasing may delegate authority to campus departments for all purchases of required supplies, materials, equipment, goods, property and services in accordance with the terms of this Policy document and approved purchasing procedures;

2.       $5,000 and over – purchases of required supplies, materials, equipment, goods, property and services shall be accomplished by utilizing an approved competitive solicitation type, or by an approved non-competitive processes as determined by the KU Director of Purchasing in accordance with the terms of this Policy document and approved purchasing procedures.

C. Competitive Bid Notification

A competitive bid transactions with an estimated cost that exceeds $5,000, regardless of type of competitive solicitation utilized, shall be advertised in a manner that provides reasonable notice to the public of the competitive bid opportunity. Reasonable notice may include but is not limited to electronic bulletin boards, posting of hard copy documents in a public location, publication inappropriate newspapers and trade journals and other means as deemed appropriate by the KU Director of Purchasing in accordance with approved purchasing procedures.

D. Specifications

Specifications shall be developed in a manner that are not unduly restrictive while recognizing the purpose of these Policies as detailed in Section III of this document.

E. Competitive Bid Openings

Competitive transaction bid openings shall be open to the public in accordance with approved purchasing procedures.

F. Evaluations and Award

All competitive bid responses shall be evaluated as outlined in the competitive transaction documents. The KU Director of Purchasing shall ensure the award decision treats all vendors equitably and is made in accordance with the specifications; terms and conditions utilized for the competitive transaction as well as the terms of this Policy document and approved operating procedures. Unless otherwise specified in approved purchasing procedures and in the specific bid documents governing a transaction, the criteria for award shall be on the basis of lowest responsible bidder meeting the specifications, terms and conditions established in the bid documents.

G. Determinations Required

Any decision or finding required to administer the scope of the purchasing program shall be supported by a written determination prepared or approved by the KU Director of Purchasing in accordance with approved purchasing procedures.

Section VII – Vendor Suspension

The KU Director of Purchasing may issue a written determination to suspend a vendor from doing business with the University pending an investigation to determine whether cause exists for debarment in accordance with approved purchasing procedures.

A written notice of the suspension, including a copy of the determination, shall be sent to the suspended vendor with a copy to the KU Associate Vice Provost/Comptroller.

The suspension period will be effective upon issuance of the notice of suspension.

Section VIII – Vendor Debarment

A.  A vendor may be debarred for any of the following reasons:

1.       Conviction of a criminal offense in relation to obtaining or attempting to obtain a University contract or in the performance of such contract;

2.       Conviction under State of Kansas or Federal statutes of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records or receiving stolen property;

3.       Conviction under State of Kansas or Federal antitrust statutes arising out of the submission of bids or proposals;

4.       Failure to perform in accordance with the terms of one or more contracts following notice of such failure, or a history of failure to perform, or of unsatisfactory performance of one or more contracts;

5.       The vendor is currently under debarment by any other governmental entity that is based upon a settlement agreement or a final administrative or judicial determination issued by a Federal, state or local governmental entity.

Following completion of the investigation to determine whether a vendor has engaged in activities that are cause for debarment, the KU Director of Purchasing may debar the vendor for a period of time commensurate with the seriousness of the findings.

B.  A written notice of debarment shall be sent to the vendor. The notice shall:

1.       State the debarment period; and

2.       Inform the debarred vendor that any person(s) representing the debarred vendor during the debarment period may conduct no business with the University and that any solicitation responses received from the debarred vendor during the debarment period shall not be considered.

3.       The debarment period will be effective fourteen (14) calendar days after the notice of debarment is sent to the debarred vendor.

Section IX – Dispute Resolution

A. The KU Director of Purchasing is authorized to resolve, in accordance with approved purchasing procedures, any protests regarding any and all purchasing matters including but not limited to:

1.       Any protest concerning the solicitation or award of a contract or purchase order; and

2.       Any controversy arising between the University and a contractor by virtue of a contract or purchase order between them, including, without limitation, controversies based upon breach of contract, mistake, misrepresentation, or any other cause for contract modification or rescission. 

B. The KU Director of Purchasing shall render a written decision regarding the protest within seven (7) calendar days after the protest and/or any subsequently submitted information is received. The KU Director of Purchasing shall furnish a copy of the decision to the protestor in writing in accordance with approved purchasing procedures.

C. The protesting party may appeal the written determination of the KU Director of Purchasing. If the protesting party desires to appeal, he/she must submit his/her written request for appeal to the KU Associate Vice Provost/Comptroller within seven (7) calendar days after receipt of the written determination of the KU Director of Purchasing. The decision of the Associate Vice Provost /Comptroller shall constitute the Final Agency Order regarding the matter.

Section X – Procurement Records

Procurement records are subject to disclosure pursuant to the provisions of the Kansas Open Records Act. (See Appendix C)

Procurement records shall be retained and disposed of in accordance with applicable records retention policies of the State and University of Kansas.

 

 

Appendix A - University of Kansas Procurement Code of Ethics

The conduct of all persons involved in the procurement process at the University of Kansas should be characterized by integrity and dignity, and he or she should expect and encourage such conduct by others.

The business officer should adopt and be faithful to personal values that accord respect to self and others; preserve honesty in actions and utterances; preserve honesty in actions and utterances; aspire to achieve quality; accept intellectual and moral responsibility; give fair and just treatment to all; refuse conflict, or the appearance of conflict, between personal and institutional interests; and engender forthright expression of one’s own views and tolerance for the views of others.

The business officer should act with competence and should strive to advance competence, both in self and in others.

The business officer should understand and support his or her institution’s objectives and policies, should be capable of interpreting them within and beyond the institution, and should contribute constructively to their ongoing evaluation and reformulation.

The business officer should communicate to institutional colleagues the content of this Code of Ethics and should strive to ensure that the standards of professional conduct contained therein are met.

In discharging his or her duties in accordance with this Code of Ethics, the business officer should enjoy the following rights:

the right to work in a professional and supportive environment;

the right to have a clear, written statement of the conditions of his or her employment, procedures for professional review, and a job description outlining duties and responsibilities;

within the scope of his or her authority and policy, the right to exercise judgment and perform duties without disruption or harassment; and

freedom of conscience and the right to refuse to engage in actions that violate the ethical principles contained in this Code or provisions of law.

NACUBO Code of Ethics
April 15, 1993

 

 

Appendix B – University of Kansas Conflict of Interest Policy

Please refer to the Kansas Board of Regents Policy and Procedure Manual, Chapter II, Section F (13).

http://www.kansasregents.org/academic/policymanual.html

 

 

Appendix C – Kansas Open Records Act

The terms of this act may be found in KSA 45-215 through KSA 45-223:

http://www.kslegislature.org/legsrv-statutes/index.do   

Also see

http://www.provost.ku.edu/policy/updates/open_records_act/

 

 

 

CONTACTS:

Responsible Office: Purchasing Services

 

Contact:

purchasing@ku.edu
Ph (785) 864-3790
Fax (785) 864-3454

 

APPROVED BY:

Kansas Legislature

 

APPROVED ON:

April 30, 2007

 

EFFECTIVE ON:

June 1, 2007

 

REVIEW CYCLE:

To be reevaluated on June 30, 2010

 

 

 

BACKGROUND:

See Appendix A – University of Kansas Procurement Code of Ethics

 

KEYWORDS:

Procurement, Competitive Bids, Vendor Suspension, Vendor Disbarment, Code of Ethics, KSA 76-769, Conflicts of Interest, Dispute Resolution, Kansas Open Records Act